It happened so subtly, accompanied by so little fanfare, that you may not have even noticed it. In fact, it took a torn lateral meniscus in the left knee of Osi Umenyiora, suffered as he rushed the quarterback in a meaningless preseason contest, to bring the issue into the spotlight:
Michael Strahan has retired from the NFL.
Not that he necessarily wanted them, but Strahan would have had a hard time jockeying for headlines as he left his NFL career behind him following the 2007 season. Newspapers, blogs, and the first half hour of every episode of Sportscenter this past summer were dominated by another prominent "retirement:" that of Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre.
Just as Favre deserves all the criticism he receives for the way he played coy with the media, orchestrating his presence as a perpetual top story while pretending not to want media attention, Strahan is to be commended for the grace and sincerity with which he entered a life of retirement. While Favre dragged us all along with him as he proved incapable of making a decision with any conviction whatsoever, texting his BFF Rachel Nichols whenever he wanted to return to the headlines, Strahan made his decision and stuck with it, accepting that retiring from the NFL meant that his life was now a nonstory. And while Strahan is now "open to returning," just as Favre was, the two players' motivations could not be more opposite. While Favre torpedoed and eventually abandoned the team he claimed to love for all those years, Strahan appears to be considering a return only because it may save a team he truly does care for.
Even the circumstances under which the two players retired highlights the differences between their style of play. Strahan had the guts and the knowhow to go out on top, following a Super Bowl victory that his defense won almost singlehandedly. Favre, on the other hand, tried to leave on the heels of yet another ill-advised interception, a significant element of his playing style that the media always seemed to forget to mention.
Now, in what has been one of the most exciting offseasons in recent memory, the two players have reaped what they sowed. Favre found himself in a no-win situation: accept a buyout from the Packers and prove that his love of football could be bought from him, play turncoat against the franchise that turned him into an icon, or play spoiler to the career of Aaron Rodgers and the future of the Packers. Strahan, on the other hand, cannot lose: either he stays retired and proves that, unlike some, he meant it when he said he was done, or he comes back and stands as the guy the Giants could always count on when they needed him. Favre, who always masqueraded as a classy guy, has revealed his selfishness to the world, while Strahan, who truly is one, has nowhere to go but up.
Oh, and by the way: the QB that Umenyiora was chasing when his ligaments gave out on him? None other than New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
i think you're a little too harsh on favre - and perhaps understandably given some of the attention he stole from tom brady last year.
the packers were the one who forced him into making a decision quickly. rather than waiting and letting him really think it out, the green bay front office was continually asking, when? when? when? if they had let him take his time, he probably wouldn't have retired in the first place.
as for "torpedoing" green bay, that's far from the truth. he would have been happy to play in wisconsin again, but it was the packers who weren't ready to have him back. i can't see how you could blame favre for that.
as for the media attention surrounding favre, there's no doubt that he is responsible for part of it. but comparing strahan and favre is just not fair. as good a player as strahan in, he is a D end in a QB's league. and we're talking brett favre, legendary iron man and the official religion of wisconsin. of course he'll be in the news more.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3552159
"The paper had previously reported Strahan would come back with the Giants if offered an $8 million contract for this season, according to a source close to Strahan.
The Daily News later reported several of Strahan's friends said Monday that his interest in talking about a possible contract is genuine, but that he may seek as much as $12 million for this season."
ah yes... strahan's pure love of the game.
Believe me--after he lost the Super Bowl, and stopped being a quarterback and started being The Guy Who Dates Gisele, the less attention Tom Brady got in the offseason, the better.
I certainly agree the Packers aren't blameless victims here, but I do believe Favre's retirement decision was his own, and when he had "the itch" to play, he didn't have to let the world know about it until he knew what he wanted to do. And I do consider it "torpedoing," since he told his team he was leaving, they took his word for it and went in a new direction, and then he, well, pooped all over that.
I do think you have a very fair point about Favre having inherently more star power/media attention. That's completely true and needs to be factored in, which I failed to do. However, I don't think that changes my opinion that Strahan retired the classy way and Favre did not. Did not keep it classy, that is. Also did not retire.
And as for the Strahan contract negotiations--you have a good point, twisting the Giants' arm (that is weird grammatically, it feels like it should be "arms") is just about the one thing he can do to come out of this situation as the bad guy, and he shouldn't do it. That being said, as long as the negotiations remain amicable (which Favre's did not), I don't completely begrudge him the right to negotiate for a higher salary.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3554776
"He was very close to returning, but the great part about Michael is that he takes his time to think about things and he is very thorough," Tony Agnone said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday night.
a testament to your point, d.r.w.
Of course, to play devil's (K.L.'s?) advocate, it could also be a giant double standard: Michael Strahan "takes his time with important decisions" and "thinks things through," while Brett Favre "can't commit" and "doesn't have the conviction to make up his mind."
Post a Comment